As long as entertainment is linked to a distribution, it can not be free (meaning free). As long as television studios distribute sitcoms, where sitcoms have to play by their rules and the content complies with Studios’needs. As long as movie studios distribute movies, film producers, content must be consistent with them Studios’needs.

Only when the distribution channel is no longer sets the rules for entertainment and those who create it to be free. This can only happen when an outlet like the Internet combined with the artist’s ability to project self-financing. If artists are dependent on the advertising needs of television studios and pay per view model of the movies, where their art is only of value insofar as it meets those standards.

By using complementary platforms, creative professionals and content producers can get their own funding for their content. Thus, they can create any kind of content they want and that the market will finance. If they meet market needs and is dependent on the revenues they raise themselves, rather than those achieved through studies by use of their work, they release their artistic limits, and then distribute as they want over the Internet free themselves from the distributor’s Corporate Standards.

The current business model, where videos economic potential associated with hosting the video is not for advertisers, content providers and even hosts themselves. Get real content independent, producers must rely on the market determine value, and not corporate middlemen who determines the value based on their costs and balance sheets.